Sr. Nathalie Becquart, undersecretary of the Vatican's synod office, speak in the Archdiocese of Newark First, Sister Nathalie presented a much-needed reality check. Not only is synodality essentially "about the reception of the Second Vatican Council," she said, "but the history of the church teaches us that the reception of the council, it's at least 100 … 150 years. So, we are just half-road, and that’s why we need patience and it's not easy.”
The sweeping changes implemented, experienced and witnessed in past decades by today's dominant religious life age cohort, now in their 70s to 90s, marked the beginning of renewal, not the end. The torch is now passing on to the next generations to continue the adaptation and renewal of religious life during this change of era, and beyond, for the sake of mission. So what is our generation to do?
To answer this central question, I have been sitting with the second point in Sister Nathalie's talk that caught my attention. When the council wrote Lumen Gentium, the dogmatic constitution on the church, they chose to place chapter two on the people of God before chapter three on the hierarchy. "That means you need to read chapter three with the glasses of chapter two," she said. In terms of synodality, this leads to a vision of co-responsibility where "those who are in charge exercising their authority are not separated from the community but inside churning together." All the baptized "are bound together as the body of Christ." called to a "relationship of mutuality, interdependency." She sees this as the root of "the most important spiritual attitude for synodality," namely humility. "It's embracing our own vulnerability. It's about recognizing the needs of the others," she said.
As a Catholic born about a decade after the council, I sometimes take for granted the involvement of lay people in the life, mission and ministry of the church. Yet Lumen Gentium marked a radical shift in the recognition of the call of all the people of God to serve Christ's mission. "Upon all the laity, (Upon all the laity, therefore, rests the noble duty of working to extend the divine plan of salvation to all men of each epoch and in every land. Consequently, may every opportunity be given them so that, according to their abilities and the needs of the times, they may zealously participate in the saving work of the Church.) therefore, rests the noble duty of working to extend the divine plan of salvation to all [people] of each epoch and in every land," it said.
https://www.vatican.va/archive/hist_councils/ii_vatican_council/documents/vat-ii_const_19641121_lumen-gentium_en.html#:~:text=Upon%20all%20the,of%20the%20Church.
The generations of vowed religious who first answered the call to the adaptation and renewal of religious life also helped to implement this shift through the faithful accompaniment, education and empowerment of the people of God. I believe that God calls the people needed to meet the wants of the age. Returning to my thought experiment, then, does it not make sense that as more lay women and men have been called to ministry, the number called to vowed life would decrease, that this is right and just, a rightsizing if you will, and something to be celebrated rather than lamented?
I sometimes worry that my elder sisters, looking at the numbers of those passing vs. those entering the community, feel a sense of failure at some level closer to the unconscious. Yet, in the context of my thought experiment, has renewal to date not been a success? They creatively answered the call of Perfectae Caritatis to "both the constant return to the sources of all Christian life and to the original spirit of the institutes and their adaptation to the changed conditions of our time." (Emphasis mine.)
My thought experiment leads me to believe that the church does not need large numbers of vowed women to teach and nurse or even to be principals or chief executive officers of nonprofit organizations. Social and ecclesial conditions have changed, and there are others better poised and prepared to do these important things. We are also no longer needed to prepare the laity for ministry, but rather to work with and alongside them.
We are being called into the next evolution of the dynamic relationship of mutuality outlined in Lumen Gentium:
Let no one think that religious have become strangers to their [brothers and sisters] or useless citizens of this earthly city by their consecration. For even though it sometimes happens that religious do not directly mingle with their contemporaries, yet in a more profound sense these same religious are united with them in the heart of Christ and spiritually cooperate with them .
As we reimagine religious life during this change of era, we are graced to realize again that we are not set apart. Yet we do have a unique call framed by the strength of our common life, the depth of our spiritual tradition and the freedom of our vows. We are called, even in our own vulnerability, to be humbly present to the vulnerabilities of those on the margins. How might the Holy Spirit be calling us to synodality, to journey with the people of God, as people vowed to the Gospel?
The closing call of Perfectate Caritatis still rings true today:
Religious institutes, for whom these norms of adaptation and renewal have been laid down, should respond generously to the specific vocation God gave them as well as their work in the Church today. … Let all religious, therefore, rooted in faith and filled with love for God and neighbor, love of the cross and the hope of future glory, spread the good news of Christ throughout the whole world so that their witness may be seen by all …
Amen.
https://www.globalsistersreport.org/religious-life/my-thought-experiment-religious-life
